|
Jan
26
2007
|
by Gina Shattuck
|
|
Friday, 26 January 2007 |
I am confused – and dismayed - by the Ithaca Journal’s recent articles regarding freedom of information and open meeting laws relative to the Lansing School District.
My confusion is this: Mr. Dubin was a member of the Capital Project Committee. He had the opportunity to attend every meeting and receive every communication/document (electronic and hard copy) related to the process and the project. He had the opportunity to voice his opinion and ask questions during the entire process. Has this been mentioned in any of the recent articles? |
|
|
Jan
26
2007
|
by Hugh Bahar
|
|
Friday, 26 January 2007 |
|
I believe that there is a healthy undercurrent of opposition to this school capital project, and I look forward to hearing those voices put forth thoughtful arguments both here and in the Journal in the next few weeks. After sitting on two school Facilities Committees and knowing the issues with the schools, I believe that the flyer the BOE released does a good job of communicating the proposed changes and their underlying justifications. |
|
|
|
Jan
26
2007
|
by Maureen and Jim Bell
|
|
Friday, 26 January 2007 |
On February 6, Town of Lansing voters will vote on two Propositions for repairs and improvements to Lansing Central School District buildings. More than half of Proposition 1 funds would go towards needed repairs to the Bus Garage, Elementary, Middle, and High School. The rest would be for High School renovations and additions. The architects’ plans are posted in the schools, at Curves and the Field/Rink in Lansing, and at http://www.lansingschools.org under "Capital Project Information".
After negative community feedback regarding earlier possible propositions, a Facilities and Community Awareness Committee (FCAC) of parents, teachers, and administrators in the District plus engineering and architectural advisors was formed. This group assessed which potential maintenance and renovation items must be done for building safety (roofing, HVAC, etc.) as well as which should be done for the schools to continue to offer the exceptional education experience that Lansing residents have come to expect.
|
|
|
|
Jan
26
2007
|
by Chris and Clara Barrett
|
|
Friday, 26 January 2007 |
Many of us recall the old oil filter commercial in which a mechanic urged viewers to buy a good oil filter rather than pay a lot more later to rebuild a car’s engine, cautioning “you can pay me now … or you can pay me later.” The point was that forces beyond our control – in that case, the natural toll mileage takes on a vehicle – often deny us the option of not paying. The only true choice is when, how and how much we pay. That bit of Madison Avenue wisdom applies to the two school capital improvement proposals before Lansing voters.
|
|
|
|
Jan
25
2007
|
by Dan Veaner
|
|
Thursday, 25 January 2007 |
While sentiment seems to be leaning favorably toward the Lansing school capital project, the vote is anything but sure. The reason is that people tend not to vote in off elections. And if the low turnout at the public hearing Tuesday is any indication, the chance for low voter turnout seems likely. People may assume it is going to pass and not vote -- some say that is why the first budget failed last year.
There are two reasons why you should vote: kids and money. In that order. Most people want our kids to have the best educational opportunities we can provide, and providing an adequate physical plant is a major element in the district's ability to do that. Crowding in the high school puts it at risk academically and puts students' safety at risk as well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
<< Start < Prev 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next > End >>
|
| Results 154 - 162 of 282 |
Archive Opinions 
