When the BOE proposed the 2008-2009 school budget to the Lansing residents, they told us that if it passed, we should expect a school tax rate of about $17.96 per $1000 of assessed property value. The actual rate that the BOE set this month was $17.76 per $1000, a slight decrease in the expected rate. However, the headline in your article "School Board Chooses Higher Tax Rate" was very misleading and strongly implied that the BOE increased the tax rate over the promised figure. Unfortunately, because of that article, some town residents have come away with the wrong impression, adding unfairly and unnecessarily to their concerns about school taxes and how the current BOE is operating.
I think it's wise for the BOE to try to restore the district's reserve funds to a reasonable level. Just as it's prudent for people to have a bank account in order to handle unexpected expenses, it's also wise for a school district to have reserves. In the recent past, the district unwisely spent down the reserves in order to pay ongoing expenses. Now that the district has a chance to begin to restore those reserves without burdening the taxpayers beyond what was expected, it seems like an opportune time to do so. The district has traditionally had reasonable reserves and never spent them unwisely with the exception of the recent fiscal aberrations. The actions of the current BOE and administration over the past year indicate that they will most likely be used responsibly again.
Last spring, interim business administrator Dave Klem explained
another reason that reserves are important. He mentioned that the
recent reduction in reserves could affect our bond rating. As bond
ratings go down, the interest charged on bonds goes up, which is
ultimately paid for by the taxpayers. He estimated it will take three
to five years to get the reserves back to an appropriate level.
Dave
also told us about budget problems looming on the horizon that could
adversely affect next year's budget situation. For one, this year the
district received a special high tax aid from the state which is
generally very difficult to qualify for and probably won't be repeated
next year. Another concern is the relationship of state aid to the
success of the stock market and the economy in general. With the
economy currently on the downswing, it's possible that we will receive
less state aid next year. He advised us to prepare for such potential
eventualities.
In addition, interest on reserves represents one
of the income flows for the district. As the reserves increase, so does
the interest that the district receives. Without adequate reserves, the
taxpayers must make up for the interest income that the reserves no
longer provide. It may very well save us money in the future.
So
it appears that there are several reasons why the BOE was wise to
increase the reserves when they had the chance to do so without
increasing the tax burden they promised the district residents.
Undoubtedly
local taxes are a serious expense and school taxes are a large part of
them. But I think we need to keep in mind that the school's financial
woes started several years ago, and it's only with new leadership in
the past year that the situation has started to improve. The
improvements won't happen overnight, but the current board and
administration have made many serious efforts to bring spending under
control. For example, the past year was the first time that I can
remember a BOE actually having to eliminate some teacher and staff
positions.
In some ways, we are in good shape. For the first time
in several years, we have an administration and BOE that is taking our
fiscal concerns seriously. During his stay with us, Dave Klem did a
remarkable job in correcting many of the problems he inherited and in
getting the district back on the track to fiscal responsibility.
Superintendent Steve Grimm demonstrated in the last budget cycle that
he is willing to take serious actions to get spending under control.
Though she has been here only a brief time, new business administrator
Mary June King obviously understands the situation and is already
keeping a close eye on the budget.
We currently have a BOE that
is actively monitoring the budget, unlike some previous boards that
ignored the public concerns and warning signs that the district was in
trouble. We need to keep in mind that the majority of the BOE was
elected in the past two years. Three of them ran for the board
primarily because of their concerns about the budget. Two of them have
been on the board for only a few weeks, and already they're
demonstrating their determination to control spending.
Taxes can
certainly be a substantial expense. It's very important that Lansing
residents pay close attention to how their money is being spent and
hold their elected officials accountable. While we always need to be
vigilant, I don't think the current administration and BOE have given
the community cause for concern. Let's keep watching them carefully,
but let's also give them the benefit of the doubt as long as their
actions demonstrate their continuing concern for the taxpayers and our
students.
From: Ted Laux
Ithaca NY 14850
----
v4i32
|